Skip to content
Cropped version of the official logo of Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, representing quantitative finance education and research.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Multi-Method VaRCalc
  • Algorithmic Trading Models
  • QuantFin Services
Edu Hub
Cropped version of the official logo of Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, representing quantitative finance education and research.
Dr Krzysztof Ozimek
Edu Hub
  • Three-stage research methodology diagram: dynamic topological description via BallMapper, decoder-conditional VAE anomaly scoring, and penalised Function-on-Function regression for intraday return predictability.
    Quantitative Finance

    Can the Topological Shape of the Market Predict How Returns Evolve?

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    I am pleased to announce that my new paper is now available:

    “Cross-Sectional Topological Anomaly Scores and Intraday Return Predictability: BallMapper Descriptors, Decoder-Conditional VAE, and Function-on-Function Regression on S&P 500 Intraday Data”

    Read More Can the Topological Shape of the Market Predict How Returns Evolve?Continue

  • Bubble chart showing rolling risk–return dynamics for ten S&P 500 equities (AAPL, AMZN, AVGO, GOOG, META, MSFT, NVDA, TSLA and others) over April 2025–March 2026, with standard deviation on the x-axis, mean return on the y-axis, and bubble size proportional to trading volume.
    Quantitative Finance

    Dynamic Rolling Risk–Return‑Volume Insight: Ten Highly Liquid S&P 500 Constituents

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    The chart visualizes rolling risk–return–volume dynamics for ten highly liquid S&P 500 constituents — AAPL, AMZN, AVGO, GOOG, GOOGL, META, MSFT, NVDA, PLTR, and TSLA — selected, over the April 2025–March 2026 period, by ranking all index members on the Amihud (2002) illiquidity ratio — a widely used measure of price impact per unit of trading volume — and retaining the ten most liquid stocks. Intraday OHLCV data for that period were sourced from EODHD (eodhd.com) at 5‑minute resolution and then aggregated to the 15‑, 30‑, and 60‑minute frequencies.

    Read More Dynamic Rolling Risk–Return‑Volume Insight: Ten Highly Liquid S&P 500 ConstituentsContinue

  • Abstract financial visualization representing algorithmic trading and market structure.
    Quantitative Finance

    Simpson’s Paradox in Trading: When Aggregation Reverses Algorithm Rankings

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    When evaluating trading algorithms, it is common to compare their average performance across the entire dataset. But if algorithms are used differently across market regimes, aggregated performance can produce a completely false ranking. The example below shows how an algorithm that is worse in every regime can appear superior overall.

    Read More Simpson’s Paradox in Trading: When Aggregation Reverses Algorithm RankingsContinue

  • EGARCH(1,1) conditional variance response to positive and negative shocks — leverage effect visualization
    Quantitative Finance

    Modeling Asymmetric Volatility with EGARCH

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    This post presents an accessible introduction to the Exponential GARCH (EGARCH) model—a widely used tool in financial econometrics for modeling time-varying volatility in asset returns. Unlike standard GARCH models, EGARCH captures both volatility clustering and the leverage effect, whereby negative shocks tend to increase future volatility more than positive shocks of equal magnitude. The post demonstrates how EGARCH achieves this using a simplified form, with an emphasis on the asymmetry function’s role in shaping variance dynamics. The dynamic visualization of EGARCH volatility asymmetry presented in this post was created by the author using Desmos.

    Read More Modeling Asymmetric Volatility with EGARCHContinue

  • Two symmetric price paths showing identical volatility but opposite economic outcomes, illustrating why volatility can misrepresent risk.
    Quantitative Finance

    Why Volatility Alone Can Misrepresent Risk

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    Volatility is widely used as a proxy for risk, largely because it is easy to compute and fits neatly into different models such as CAPM. Yet treating volatility as the measure of risk can be…

    Read More Why Volatility Alone Can Misrepresent RiskContinue

  • Formula for calculating the minimum sample size required to verify a claimed Sharpe ratio.
    Quantitative Finance

    Minimum Sample Size Required to Verify a Claimed Sharpe Ratio

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    Minimum Sample Size Formula To determine how many observations are required to assess, with confidence level (1 – alpha), that a trading strategy achieves a claimed target Sharpe ratio, the following approximation can be used…

    Read More Minimum Sample Size Required to Verify a Claimed Sharpe RatioContinue

  • Kelly allocation chart showing optimal portfolio growth with high volatility versus expected return
    Quantitative Finance

    The Kelly Allocation to a Single Security

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    Kelly allocation to a single risky security with volatility twice the expected return. The Kelly Allocation to a Single Security We consider a portfolio with two assets: a risk-free asset and a risky asset. Let…

    Read More The Kelly Allocation to a Single SecurityContinue

  • Marčenko–Pastur distribution showing theoretical bounds for eigenvalues of random covariance matrices.
    Quantitative Finance

    Detecting Structure in Financial Covariance Matrices Using the Marčenko–Pastur Distribution

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    This post introduces a simulation-based test using the Marčenko–Pastur distribution to assess the randomness of covariance matrices. By comparing the proportion of eigenvalues within theoretical MP bounds to those from simulated random matrices, the test produces an empirical p-value that helps determine whether a matrix reflects real structure or noise. Implemented in both R and Python, the method is especially useful for high-dimensional data analysis in finance. The mp_randomness_test function presented here is an original contribution by Dr Krzysztof Ozimek.

    Read More Detecting Structure in Financial Covariance Matrices Using the Marčenko–Pastur DistributionContinue

  • Final formula for calculating investment return in domestic currency, adjusting for foreign asset return and exchange rate change
    Quantitative Finance

    Calculating the Return on Investment in Currency X When Investing in Currency Y

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    This post presents a method for calculating the return on an investment denominated in a base currency X, when the actual investment is made in a foreign currency Y. The approach considers both the performance of the asset in Y and the movement of the exchange rate between X and Y. A general formula is derived and explained in detail, along with a simplified approximation for practical use. The analysis also accommodates trade costs, taxes, and inflation. Several scenarios are discussed to illustrate how currency appreciation or depreciation affects investment returns. A numerical example is provided, alongside R and Python implementations of the calculation.

    Read More Calculating the Return on Investment in Currency X When Investing in Currency YContinue

  • Table of CDF terms used in joint probability calculation for three variables
    Quantitative Finance

    Joint Probability over Hyperrectangles: From Theory to Trading Concepts

    Dr Krzysztof Ozimek, a Quantitative Investment & Trading Research EducatorDr Krzysztof Ozimek

    This post explores how joint probabilities over bounded regions — known as hyperrectangles — can be expressed as combinations of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs). A general formula is presented and illustrated through a simplified three-variable cases. We demonstrate how this structure can be used in practice with toy data, using my R function (jp()) to automate the calculation. Finally, we discuss its relevance in algorithmic trading, where such joint probabilities may serve as reliable triggers for short-term allocation strategies.

    Read More Joint Probability over Hyperrectangles: From Theory to Trading ConceptsContinue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 2 3 4 5 Next PageNext
Disclaimer

All content made available through drkrzysztofozimek.com, including but not limited to digital products, courses, textbooks, articles, and newsletters, is provided for educational purposes only.

We do not provide financial, investment, or trading advice. The information is not intended as a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk.

Eduinn Krzysztof Ozimek shall not be held liable for any loss, damage, or consequences resulting directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.

Eduinn Krzysztof Ozimek

ul. Kryształowa 31/21
01-356 Warsaw
Poland

NIP 526 225 97 76

Telephone: +48 796 594 098
E-mail: contact@drkrzysztofozimek.com

Quantocracy featured quant finance blog badge

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Edu Hub
  • Multi-Method VaRCalc
  • Algorithmic Trading Models
  • QuantFin Services

Research

SSRN
arXiv
ORCID

© 2026 Dr Krzysztof Ozimek

Linkedin Facebook YouTube
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Multi-Method VaRCalc
  • Algorithmic Trading Models
  • QuantFin Services
Search